Triumph

Kate O’Flynn as Iris. Photo by Marc Brenner.

Triumph by Caryl Churchill – Almeida Theatre, London

Published at Plays International

Ten or more years ago, there were regular complaints that no-one was writing political plays any more. It seems like a very long time ago now. These days, post-Brexit, post-COVID, mid-climate and cost-of-living crisis and deep into the second coming of Trump, there is no ignoring politics. It looms large in everyone’s lives. It is in this context that a new play by Caryl Churchill feels like an event, and all the more so when it is a piece that runs for a mere 20 minutes, presented as a standalone production at the Almeida over a handful of performances. Triumph feels very much an occasion. The Almeida foyer is peppered with familiar faces, people whispering about who they have spotted, and front of house staff “unable to confirm or deny” whether Churchill herself is in the audience. There is real buzz of the kind not generally found on a Sunday afternoon.

Churchill is 88, but her work still feels essential. With new Churchill plays scheduled at the Almeida in the New Year, Triumph is statement of intent from new artistic director Dominic Cooke. Not since the theatre staged Harold Pinter’s final works in the mid-1990s has been associated with a writer making urgent, late-career statements on where society has got to. Tr(i)u(m)p(h) is a piercing, conceptually powerful piece about a Karoline Leavitt-esque press spokesperson, standing behind a lecture to deliver mind-boggling statements on behalf of their boss, combining terror with hubris and farce on a gothic scale.

Directed by James Macdonald, Triumph plays out on a set by Miriam Buether lit with burning braziers, half blood-red press conference dais and half blood-red double-bed. Spokesperson Iris (Kate O’Flynn) dons a blonde wig to read prepared statements, and takes it off to sleep with the opposition – journalist Marcus (Matthew Beard). The thing is, everything she says on behalf of ‘The Emperor’ is taken directly from Suetonius’ compendium of tyranny, The Twelve Caesars. Her announcements rang from the bizarre – “The Emperor has installed a gold throne” – to the ludicrous – “The Emperor is paying for 250 young Romans to learn how to applaud.” The tone becomes darker, as the consequences of crossing the leader become clear, for Marcus and for everyone else. The press conference acquires a section introduced as “In other amputations”, and the violence inflicted on opponents by the state increasingly grotesque. Iris thinks she is exposing the truth The Emperor wants to conceal, but discovers that the more ruthless he seems the more popular he becomes, and the happier he is.

Triumph is a short but very pointed broadside about what people do to keep the Emperor happy – “a grim joke about where we are today.” The conceit of quoting Suetonius is inspired, allowing Churchill makes brutal connections between the the lies, cruelty and decadence of the last days of ancient Rome and the horror show we find ourselves in, under the megalomaniac rule of a very current leader. The running time may be short, but Triumph is the length it needs to be, no more or less. It takes just 20 minutes to draw persuasive performances from the cast, and lodge a succession of horrific images firmly in the audience’s mind. It only takes 20 minutes to make the point, forcefully, that we have enabled monsters before and we have done it again, creating a situation where leaders, and one leader in particular, can do whatever they please. This bodes ill for society, but political theatre is right at the centre of our cultural response to despairing times.

The Plough and the Stars

Photo by Roz Kavanagh

The Plough and the Stars by Sean O’Casey – Abbey Theatre, Dublin

Published at Plays International

Sean O’Casey’s 1926 play is a super-local drama, describing events that took place on the Abbey Theatre’s doorstep during the 1916 Easter Rising in Dublin. Set in a nearby tenement block around the corner from the General Post Office, as it is besieged by the British Army, it is a masterpiece with Shakespearian character and scale but, as a modern work, a more immediate impact. Tom Creed’s centenary production for the Abbey revisits a play which, at its première, upset sections of the audience so much they rioted. Theatrical riots can seem strange and archaic: it is hard to understand why the Abbey’s patrons got so hot under the collar at the Abbey première of A Playboy of the Western World twenty years earlier. However, it is entirely different with The Plough and the Stars. Creed’s riveting production reveals it to be provocative and iconoclastic one hundred years on, and relevant to an extent that should alarm us as a society.

In Dublin, where streets and stations are named after Easter Uprising leaders and 1916 is commemorated all over town, questioning the credentials of the Irish Citizen Army and the Irish Volunteers is close to heresy. Sean O’Casey tears the rebels to pieces, along with the British. He pulls idealisers to the ground, and elevates ordinary, fundamentally flawed people who do not live the lives politicians imagine for them. Snatches of Patrick Pearse’s speeches ahead of the uprising drift through the pub window during the play, his calls for a blood sacrifice to cleanse the soil sounding fascistic and unhinged. As we fail to learn the endlessly repeated lesson that violence brutalises and destroys, the play still has the capacity to upset the accepted view of history. 

O’Casey’s towering achievement is to craft a play built around such a large, complex, yet wholly convincing cast of characters. His tenement inhabitants reveal a society with an ease comparable to the Henry IV plays. There are many fine roles, but it is particularly notable how well he wrote the female characters, who are all complex, unidealised and alive – an achievement beyond most male playwrights of the time. The Abbey’s cast are fully immersed in the play’s world, and seem to emerge from the setting rather than imposing their performances on it. Kate Glimore’s tragic Nora Clitheroe puts everything she has into saving Eimhin Fitzgerald Doherty’s doomed Jack, knows exactly what she has to lose, and fails. Her descent into madness is horrifying. Mary Murray’s Bessie Burgess is confrontational and aggressive, but also unexpectedly kind, with a tale as confounding as anyone. Kate Stanley Brennan is very funny as Mrs. Grogan, her lyricism and larking a terrible counterpoint to her hollow-eyed, dying daughter Mollser (Evie May O’Brien). O’Casey’s incorporation of humour into the dark events is a masterclass in dramatic writing. Caitríona Ennis’s Rosie is desperate, but achieves a moment of remarkable dignity when she, accused of being a prostitute, her silence speaks volumes. 

The men in the play do not understand what is coming, and what the consequences of war will be. Michael Glenn Murphy’s Peter Flynn is a comic braggart, perhaps the most ludicrous character in the play, from a Shakespearian lineage of old men who fancy themselves as soldiers. Thommas Kane Byrne’s Marxist Young Covey is smackably smug and very entertaining, but also the only man who lets his front fall apart at the end. Fluther is one of the great comic everyman roles, a man who survives despite his own best efforts, and Dan Monaghan delivers both entertainment and depth. Ash Rizi, Fintan Kinsella and Conor Wolfe O’Hara as the British soldiers who arrive on the scene to make things, inevitably, much worse are frightened and dangerous. 

Jamie Vartan’s sets are somewhat confrontational, consisting of unpainted, plywood flats and minimal decor, but they prove very effective. At times the characters feel like ghosts, inhabiting a place that is fading out around them, casting long shadows on the bare walls. The revolve is elegantly used to switch scenes, and seems to echo the transience of time and the lives it contains. The production is superbly powerful – in the commitment of the performers, the vivacity of the characters who live on, a century down the line, and the uncompromising message of the play – that war is madness. Creed’s production reaffirms O’Casey’s status as a great writer who still has much to teach, and whose work remains gripping from start to finish.