Are You Watching?

Kosar Ali and Abby McCann. Photo by Tristram Kenton/The Guardian

Are You Watching? by Georgie Dettmer – Royal Court Theatre Upstairs, London

The most disturbing aspect of Georgie Dettmer’s play about internet horror, at the top of a long list, are the two teenage girls. Kosar Ali and Abby McCann watch in their pyjamas from their bunk beds, as the full capacity of online culture to sexualise society and victimise women plays out for their entertainment. It does so with the audience lined up facing one another, either side of Georgia Wilmot’s white-tiled swimming pool style stage, with its unsettling, clinical, wipe-clean implications.

Dettmer’s debut play is a cry of rage, which lives on in the minds of viewers after the curtain, not least because it is about the consequences of watching. Scenes play out as a series of unconnected but thematically linked vignettes, viewed by the two girls. Nothing protects them from seeing whatever they choose on their screens and, as they discuss the worst things they’ve ever watched, the darkness of the material they are exposed to becomes all too clear. The play is clearly inspired by real-life events. There is a Giselle Pelicot story about a women drugged by her husband, raped by his friends and filmed. A Hollywood actress has nude images grimly manipulated on the internet, as her fury with the tech bosses whose platforms host the material builds. A father makes child abuse AI videos of his son. A woman takes part in research monitoring her reactions to increasingly extreme material. A young man wins a competition to sleep with an actress. The police manipulate a mother whose daughter is missing, to get the same level of attention they did for Madeleine McCann.

The deluge of dark scenarios assaults our senses and challenges our understanding of the world we live in, powered by Jess Edwards’ sharp direction, a shutter sound clanging each scene to a close. Performances are excellent, including Nicholas Rowe as an authority figure legitimising exploitation, Lucy McCormick, barely able to hide her desperation, and Maimuna Memon and Billy Bolt as, among other characters, a couple filming one another having sex.

Dettmer’s anger is clear, and it gives the play a fierce energy. The vignette structure that provides this energy also muddies the wider message to some extent. The overall theme is to be that by acting as voyeurs we are enabling and creating abuse of women in lots of different ways, and that we dehumanise ourselves and others by imagining our lives as sexual content. However, the audience is left in some doubt about how every element of the play contributes to the play’s thesis. Nevertheless, it is an urgent piece of writing, a significant achievement for a first time writer, and the kind of work that made the Royal Court famous. If Caryl Churchill and Edward Bond got together, they might produce something rather like this.

The P Word

Waleed Akhtar and Esh Alladi. Photo by Craig Fuller

The P Word by Waleed Akhtar – Bush Theatre, London

Published at Plays International

Waleed Akhtar’s two-hander, The P Word, returns to the Bush Theatre amid high expectations. Its first run resulted in the 2023 Olivier Award for Achievement in an Affiliate Theatre, placing author and performer Waleed Akhtar in some stellar company as one of four wins in a row for the Bush, including Richard Gadd’s Baby Reindeer. The production, by original director Anthony Simpson-Pike is more than capable of rising to the occasion, although it is salutary that a play about the mistreatment of gay men remains so current.

The P Word concerns two characters, Bilal or Billy, as he prefers to be known, played by Waleed Akhtar, and Zofar, played by Esh Alladi. Billy is a young, gay British Pakistani man struggling with his ethnic identity. Cycling through constant hook-ups, he starts to want the stable relationship he’s never found, while distancing himself from his family, who tolerate him only if he does not discuss the fact he is gay. Meanwhile, Zofar is stuck in an asylum holding pattern in grim accommodation in Hounslow. He fled Pakistan after his father had his lover murdered and threatened to kill him, when he discovered his son’s sexuality.

The play builds slowly. The two characters circle one another without meeting for a significant portion of the evening. A clever set, a raised, split revolve designed by Max Johns, facilitates this and later providing a series of places for the pair to sit and meet when they finally connect. Both actors give engaging performances. Akhtar is good at convincnig others than he is just in it for the sex and the good times, but becomes increasingly less good at convincing himself. He lashes out against Pakistanis – using the ‘p’ word of the title – and Muslims, but he is also funny and charming. It takes Alladi’s wiser but more damaged Zofar to let him see the value of his identity and the absurdity of his cultural assumptions. Alladi’s performance is full of character, enthusiasm and very believable desperation.

There is little doubt from the very start that the pair will get together, but it takes longer than it should for it to happen. However, once it does the play really comes alive, and delivers a series of increasingly moving encounters as the pair find out who they really are, and what they will risk to protect one another. From here on in, the audience is fully behind the couple as they experience the brutality of UK immigration, the random homophobia and random kindness of London, and the difficulty of being safe if you are gay, and especially if you are also from South Asia. Akhtar’s play is a powerful statement, highlighting experiences that are little known, and delivering a strong campaigning message about the cruel deportation of queer people from the UK, often to face death. It is an emotionally stretching, intellectually engaging evening which leaves you feeling you’ve experienced much more than a play.

A Quartet in Autumn

Kate Duchêne and Paul Rider. Photo by Manuel Harlan.

A Quartet in Autumn by Barbara Pym, adapted by Samantha Harvey – Arcola Theatre, London

Like the much-loved novel on which it is based, Dominic Dromgoole’s production, and Samantha Harvey’s adaptation of A Quartet in Autumn is mini-masterpiece of understated human dynamics. Barbara Pym’s book, written late in her career after she had finally achieved recognition, is set in an office and deals with four people who’ve worked together for years – two men and two women. The women are retiring soon, which bring various levels of reckoning with purpose of existence, or lack of it. Lettie (Kate Duchêne is single and contemplating retiring to the country to live with her friend. Marcia (Pooky Quesnel) is defensive and reclusive, and has had ‘an operation’ she refuses to explain. Norman (Paul Rider) is bitter and enjoys provoking the women, although there is unresolved tension with Marcia. Edwin (Anthony Calf) is a widower devoted to the Church of England, but troubled by its decline.

The novel is a terrifying insight into what 1970s life was like for an older generation, baffling to those who didn’t experience it themselves. There is an underlying terror of war, especially from Marcia who hoards tins. The everyday sexism is jaw dropping, whether from Norman who deliberately uses it to goad the women, or Edwin who is casually patronising. And everyone is obsessed with status and social acceptability – whether growing a laburnum over your door will be seen as ‘too much’, or indeed whether anything will. Samantha Harvey, fresh from her Booker Prize win with ‘Orbital’ does not mess around with any of these, translating the subtleties of the way the characters talk to one another within minimal fuss into a dramatic structure that plays out beautifully on Ellie Wintour’s quadruple desk set. It’s not often that the inherently static nature of a drama has been so well used to such strong effect.

The exceptionally well-drawn roles are a delight for the performers. Anthony Calf is both deeply complacent and troubled by the many things he can’t understand. Paul Rider is very convincing as man with a lifetime’s resentment he can’t prevent from bubbling over. Pooky Quesnel is spiky and affronted as a woman intent on destroying herself without realising. But the stand-out performance comes from Kate Duchêne, who is heart-breaking as someone finally realising she can take control of her life, and very funny too. Her story about thinking she’s spotted an old friend collapsed on a station platform, getting closer and hearing her tell people to ‘fuck off’, thinking it can’t possibly be her, then wondering whether her modes of expression might have changed in the decades since she saw her, then deciding to walk away, is classic Barbara Pym, which Duchêne absolutely relishes. The only weaknesses in the production are Pym’s – although the bizarre fate of Marcia could be read as black comedy, in which case it seems slightly less over the top. The production, which is thoroughly absorbing, faithfully transmits her signature combination of apparent social conservatism blanketing deeply waspish and perceptive social critique.

Care

Credit: Johan Persson

Care by Alexander Zeldin – Young Vic, London

Published at Plays International

Alexander Zeldin’s Care begins before the audience has realised. The Young Vic stage is transformed into a care home sitting room and, as they file in, Taru Devani’s Aditi sits slumped in a wheelchair, staring fixedly at nothing. Most people seem not to notice. The final stage of life when, as elderly, dependent people, we are looked after out of sight, is the focus of Care. It is notable how much of what Zeldin shows, despite being an inherent part of everyday life, is unfamiliar on stage.

Rosanna Vize’s set is hyper-realistic, down to the hand sanitiser, wipe-clean armchairs and reproduction pictures. It is a functional, depressing and entirely familiar setting. Here, a group of elderly people are looked after by two overworked members of staff. Each is in a different world of their own, struggling to understand where they have ended up, or to communicate. New arrival Joan, played by Linda Bassett, thinks her family will take her home soon. When they visit, it is soon clear she can never live with them again. The play is the story of her time in the care home and, without giving too much away, it is intimately concerned with death.

Zeldin, who also directs, has written a play which he describes as influenced by Harold Pinter, but also shows the influence of Caryl Churchill. The dialogue among the residents is fragmented, full of confusion, pauses and non-sequiturs as they wrestle with their diminishing realities, but it is also fully realistic and beautifully observed. The presence of Linda Bassett is a reminder of Churchill’s Escaped Alone, which she starred in: another play about aging and death which foregrounds the apparently inconsequential chatter of everyday life, revealing it to be full of significance. Care does something similar, examining the apparent banality of the strategies we use to cling onto life, Bassett’s performance is extraordinary, among an exceptional cast. Arriving confident but confused, she changes before our eyes, experiencing rage, despair, and strange, unexpected joy on her journey. 

Rosie Cavaliero is remarkable as her anguished daughter, Lynn, widowed and struggling with two teenage boys. William Lawlor plays elder son Laurie with the perfect blend of teen social terror and obnoxiousness, and his aggressive relationship with his younger brother Robbie (an excellent Ethan Malony on press night, alternating with Charlie Webb) is one of the most uncomfortable and convincing sibling relationships seen on stage.

The other care home residents give universally stunning performances, full of carefully physically observed movement: Diana Payan as a tiny Paula, Ann Mitchell as confused otter-fancier Agnes, Winston Sookham as Eugene, drifting through the background. Richard Durden is responsible for two of several heart-stopping moments during the evening, suddenly breaking into song, and stripping to his incontinence underwear to hug Joan, who settles for affection from someone who thinks she’s his dead wife. Hayley Carmichael, as Simone, is a disruptive force, constantly challenging authority, discussing sex and demanding wine, while Agnes accuses her of having been ‘a woman of the night’. Overseeing the residents is Llewella Gideon’s head nurse Hazel, a towering performance as the emotional centre of the play, and her naïve assistant Fanta (Aoife Gaston) who we delight in seeing grow into her job.

Zeldin’s direction is not perfect – the production has some pacing issues which may well be ironed out during the run, and the rhythm of the residents’ disconnected dialogue requires an intense precision which is not always achieved. The play also has occasional weaknesses, and the sub-plot around the death of Lynn’s husband feels like a distraction. However, Care is an impressive achievement. At times it is very funny. Hayley Carmichael has some of the best lines (“Your otters don’t mean shit to me”). 

It is also incredibly sad, and very moving. A lengthy, silent scene, in which Hazel gives Joan, naked to the waist, a bed bath is firstly shocking, then tender and moving. A final death scene represents the process of dying – rasping, alternate breaths as the body shuts down – with an accuracy perhaps never seen before on stage, despite the innumerable stage deaths across theatrical history. Zeldin’s decision to have characters who have died sit in the audience is a small piece of genius. No one who sees this play will forget it, and few will leave dry-eyed.

Handle With Care

Handle With Care by Ontoerend Goed – Camden People’s Theatre, London

Ontoerend Goed are masters and mistresses of theatre-making, maintaining an unerring focus on the question, generally overlooked, of why we – the audience – are there. In doing so, they are very willing to break through the boundaries of what we consider theatre to be. This reaches an apogee with Handle With Care, in which they do actually turn up. The entireity of the show is contained on a box delivered to the theatre and placed on the stage, alongside cards on each seat which read “The performance begins when someone opens the box”. It is a delightful and rather brilliant conceit. I don’t know whether anyone has ever failed to open the box, but on the night I attended someone got down to it straight away. Eventually wearing a cap, provided, reading ‘Not the director’ they initiated a train of instructions setting out the dramaturgy for the performance, and bringing various audience members into carry out tasks.

Without giving too much away, the point is that every performance will be different, as it made by audience content, engagement and attitudes. Of course, all theatre is different every time, but Handle With Care swings the focus away from the stage to the people who attend every night, who are the cause of what happens on stage, and also the difference. With subtle touches, Ontoerend Goed open up the potential for moments of deep reflection, startling emotion, unexpected exuberbance and spontaneous creativity. Can an audience fill an hour essentially entertaining itself? Handle With Care shows that yes, they emphatically can. Simply occupying a space with strangers is one of humanity’s most powerful and underutilised resources. Ontoerend Goed make most theatre seem shallow and naïve, cutting directly through to what matters with uncanny precision. In some ways, all of their cumulative experience and power as a company is contained in this magical box.

Krapp’s Last Tape / Godot’s To Do List

Photo by Jack English

Godot’s To Do List by Leo Simpe-Asante / Krapp’s Last Tape by Samuel Beckett / – Royal Court Theatre, London

The Royal Court’s production of Krapp’s Last Tape is generously prefaced by a new short play written by Leo Simpe-Asante, which won the inaugural Royal Court Young Playwrights Award last year. Shakeel Haakim plays a flustered, bowler-hatted Godot who is at the mercy of a recorded female voice highly reminiscent of Alexa, voiced by Flora Ashton. Directed by Aneesha Srinivasan, the show takes place in front of the chaotic set for Krapp’s Last Tape, piled with boxes. Godot is apparently unable to do anything other than peform the endless tasks set by the voice, many of which are ridiculous or ill-advised. Haakim has the engaging presence of a natural comic, although the play does not develop far beyond its basic premise, which is a good joke but perhaps doesn’t tell us much that we don’t expect to hear.

The main attraction is Gary Oldman’s Krapp. Oldman has directed and designed the production as well, of course, as playing 69-year old Krapp as he confronts his younger self, addressing him from Reel 3, Spool 5. Oldman begins in a good humour, which rapidly dissipates as he realises the extent of the changes that happen while we are looking elsewhere. Beckett’s work is masterfully focused, every word hitting home hard. It is one of the greatest male roles in theatre and, as such, there is doubtless a temptation for an actor to make it their own, and leave their mark. This is evident in Oldman’s production and performance. He is very good, and anyone seeing his interpretation as their first will have a very worthwhile evening, but it feels like a crowded performance.

The set is very literal – a hoarder’s cavern of piled boxes of junk and teetering shelves, which Krapp roots through to locate the relevant spool. Alongside, Oldman gives the impression of playing an old man. This is not necessary. Beckett, surely, intends the actor to play themself. It’s only through being entirely oneself, on the surface unaltered from the 39-year old on tape, that the true horror of passing time is revealed to the actor and the audience. Stephen Rea understood this better in his 2025 Barbican performance, which left space all around for the darkness and, perhaps, a little hope to seep in.

Escaped Alone

Photo by Masquar Pascali

Escaped Alone by Caryl Churchill – Coronet Theatre, London

Published at Plays International

Caryl Churchill’s unsettling, beautifully crafted play is presented at the Coronet Theatre by Italian company lacasadargilla, seen at this venue two years ago with Churchill’s L’Amore Del Cuore (Heart’s Desire). Escaped Alone, written in 2016, involves three women chatting in a back garden, joined by a fourth – Mrs Jarrett – who happens to be passing. They talk inconsequentially over tea, but as they do so it becomes clear that, under the surface, they are all wrestling with their own dark inner landscapes. Lena cannot leave the house, and is consumed by depression. Sally, a retired doctor, is irrationally scared of cats. And Vi has served time in prison for killing her husband. Meanwhile, Mrs Jarrett steps out of the conversation at regular intervals to deliver terrifying but surreal monologues describing apocalyptic scenarios consuming the world – landslides, poisoning, flood, famine, wind, disease and fire.

The production, directed by Lisa Ferlazzo Natoli and Alessandro Ferroni, is performed in Italian with subtitles. This is a little problematic as it puts up a barrier between the audience and Churchill’s apparently casual, but very carefully chosen dialogue, much of which depends on the tone of voice in which is delivered – apparent normality thinly cloaking something very different. The English subtitles also need a good proof-read. It takes some getting used to, but the cast does draw the audience in. The performances, and the production, are more cartoon-like than the hyper-reality Royal Court première. The sets by Marco Rossi and Francesca Sgariboldi present a hedge-maze parody of an English garden, in which the women drink tea from china cups, mix Bloody Marys and, bizarrely, play a little cricket. This Italian take on Englishness adds humour and provides a different take on the play, seeing it in a way that’s more akin to the fantastical comedy in Churchill’s earlier writing – plays such as Cloud Nine.

Caterina Carpio as Sally, seems in control, but is at first funny then heartbreaking as she launches into a speech about the imaginary cats that plague her life. Company co-founder Alice Palazzi is Lena, equally moving as she describes the depression that has taken over her life, saying ‘Why move your mouth and do talking?’ Ariana Gaudio’s Vi jokes about killing her husband, but it becomes apparent that it has ruined her life. Meanwhile Tania Garribba, as Mrs Jarrett, prowls the set but knows there is no way out for anyone. The cast work together well, including a hilarious acapella rendition of ‘Smells Like Teen Spirit’, which they use to tease one another and the audience.

Escaped Alone – its title a quote from The Book of Job via Moby Dick, “I alone am escaped to tell you” is very prescient – her climate disaster scenarios seem less and less fictional by the day, ten years on. The way in which reality is filtered and distorted by social media is threaded throughout the play. The characters watch shows and adverts of terrifying emptiness on a big screen, emphasising the arrival of AI in our lives. The scenario might sound bleak, but Caryl Churchill something much less obvious. Escaped Alone is a play with an all-female cast of characters whose relationships with men are only occasionally discussed, and that is perhaps its most significant feature. A decade on, the play seems not so much concerned with an impending apocalypse as with the mechanisms women use to cope with life. The comfortable, interdependent conversations they have in the garden about sea birds, Julius Caesar, the definition of a billion, or the price of fish and chips are actually the most important things anyone says. The support they give one another is the reason all the characters, despite their deep troubles, are still there. Evening always comes too soon, especially in a sunny English garden, but there is no better place to be.

Between the River and the Sea

Yousef Seid. Photo by Holly Revell.

Between the River and the Sea by Yousef Seid and Isabella Sedlak – Royal Court Theatre Upstairs

Yousef Seid’s one-man, which he has written with Isabella Sedlak and performs himself, is an exploration of identity in the most contested setting of all: Israel. The show is autobiographical, and Seid discusses the experience of being an Christian-Arab Israeli. He grew up in Haifa, an Israeli citizen but not the kind who fits into perceived categories. The show was originally presented in Berlin, where Seid now lives with his family having decided that his children did not need the tensions that came with living in Israel. He himself has run up against abuse as a child for being an Arab, and for not being Arab enough. He is in the process of getting divorced from his second wife who, like his first wife, is Jewish.

Seid’s performance is open and genuine, and it feels as though he is compelled to tell us a story he simply cannot keep to himself. He tells us he does not want to talk about politics, and instead filters his experiences through a personal lens. He performs the voices of his father, girlfriends, school friends and adult friends by stepping to the side and addressing the space he has just vacated through a mic. He is very adept at this, using physical characterisations to identify the people he voices, for example the kindergarten child who picks his nose while informing Seid he’s a dirty Arab. He also speaks in English, Arab and German at various points, straddling cultural boundaries all the way.

Of course, there is no avoiding the politics and the show eventually brings us to a place where Seid, in the eyes of others has to choose. The October 7 attacks split Israelis and Palestinians like nothing before, and suddenly he found there was no room in anyone’s lives for somebody perceived not to take sides. A close Israeli friend ends contact when they feel he does not understand their feelings about relations who were murdered; a Palestinian friend feels he does not sympathise over her friends sexually assaulted and arrested by IDF soldiers. It is heartbreaking to witness the impact at individual level of divisive political discourse which makes nuance and understanding a despised commodity. Seid is left to fantasise about a utopia without Middle Eastern borders, where no-one cares who you are – a scenario that terrifies us we consider how entirely unobtainable such a world remains.

Do You Come From Gomorrah?

Photo by Roz Kavanagh

Do You Come From Gomorrah? by Frank McGuinness – Abbey Theatre Peacock Stage, Dublin

Frank McGuinness’ new play for the Abbey Theatre is stripped right back: one performer, Ryan Donaldson, describing his experiences. These come in bursts of returning memory – recounting first his boyhood with his alcoholic mother, then the Belfast boy’s home he lived in when she died, then the abuse orchestrated by the home’s boss, ‘Beastie Billy’. The place is a brothel for soldiers in the British Army, including top brass, who abuse underage boys. We never learn the narrator’s name.

It’s a harrowing piece, but barely fictional. Everyone watching the play, certainly in Ireland, will instantly make the connection to the notorious Kincora Boys Home, run by William McGrath, in which systematic abuse was accompanied by Presbyterian Unionist rhetoric, backed with beatings. Unproven stories have circulated for half a century about who knew what was happening at Kincora, and who took part in the appalling abuse that took place.

McGuinness does not attempt to explore the conspiracies: he is only interested in the experiences of the narrator, what happened to him and how he dealt with it. His language is rich and precise, carefully chosen and crafted. We know we’re in the hands of a craftsman. Ryan Donaldson performance is gripping, changing from an unsettling insistent teenager to a desperate young man before our eyes. His is both engaging and sometimes threatening, giving glimpses of the techniques he used to survive.

Sarah Baxter’s production is boldy staged in an abstract black box, with a mirror above and a pool of water below, in Alyson Cummins’ striking designs. Sinéad McKenna’s brings the setting to life with flickering reflections and long shadows. The pool, which separates Donaldson from the audience, is used for a coup de théâtre at the play’s emotional climax when he breaks through the barrier. ‘Do You Come From Gomorrah’ is seriously high quality theatre, with one of Ireland’s great playwrights bringing his remarkable skills to bear on the human cost of corruption and abuse of power.